Quoting Heather Perella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> If your goal is to directly experience dq, then > so be it. Hardly a goal to be achieved because I can't help but experience it even if I wanted to. DQ is direct experience. > Intellect is quality, too, though. > Intellect is static quality. Division in the MOQ > doesn't separate intellect from quality. Sure > intellect and direct experience are not the same, but > intellect is quality, though static. Since you seem > to want to just directly experience reality, I would > recommend not ridding intellect as quality, and > thinking intellect is not part of reality. Intellect > is part of reality. I don't WANT "to just directly experience reality." I CANNOT HELP BUT directly experience reality because there's no difference between experience and reality. > A rock is not paradoxical when a rock is distinct > and still left untouched as 'rock is dq'. A rock is not dq. Rocks don't experience. Rocks are senseless aggregates or heaps, like a pile of dirt. > I don't use S/O to define intellect and > thus, discuss intellect. A tree is brown. Show me an > S and O in this intellectual statement. The subject (S) in the objective statement (O) "A tree is brown" is the person making the assertion. ------------------------------------------------- This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/ moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
