Hello Bo, > > For me, these questions get to the root of what I believe about > > reality. I believe interaction is everything. > > Interaction between what? Reality and Life interacting with itself and creating reality and life. > > We can approach reality dualistically like a brain in a vat and > > realize limited interaction and separateness from reality. Or we can > > approach reality non-dualistically and realize abundant interaction > > and oneness with reality. My experience is we all do both and that > > most people, including myself, spend most of thier lives like brains > > in vats. > > This looks more promising, at least Kevin sees it possible to > transcend SOM but then he proceeds down "oneness" dead end, > as if the sole alternative to S/O-dualism is monism. Why not the > better dualism where the "Brain in Vat" view becomes a > VALUABLE yet limited outlook? Why not both? Thanks Bo. Kevin
--------------------------------- Get your own web address. Have a HUGE year through Yahoo! Small Business. moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
