David M said to dmb: So you agree for imagination (clearly based on possibles) is real?
dmb says: Sigh. Yes, Dave. That is the whole point. I'm saying that you're at talking nonsense because you've confused imagination and expectation with the imagined and expected. I'm saying that there is no such thing as "the possible" outside of imagination. It hardly matters if we are talking about being attacked by a lion or gambling in Vegas.... David M's example: ...Now throw a dice. We see it tumble. We know it it has six possible end states. We do not know which will become actual until it stops. All remain possible until the dice stops and one state becomes actual. The dice stops, a six is thrown, it has come to rest and the other five possibles have not become actual, for this throw they have been forever 'withdrawn -this is a metaphor for what is not the given reality, i.e. the dice is no longer in the rolling process, take the metaphor how you like or suggest another. dmb says: A metaphor for what is not the given reality. Exactly. This is what I meant in complaining that "the possible" is a sign that refers to nothing. I'm saying that "the possibilities" are real (the five sides that did not come up when the die stopped rolling) only as a metaphor and do not exist outside of the imagination. I'm not saying that metaphors are unreal. I'm saying there is a difference between what we can imagine and "the possible". My little "thought experiment" was aimed at pointing out that "the possible" may sometimes be entirely unimaginable. In that case there is no way to confuse "the possible" with imagination because it is unimaginable and yet it possible. This kind of unimaginable possibility has no chance of being considered real because it is neither actual nor even imagined. It is something we cannot anticipate in the imagination and hasn't yet been manifest as any kind of experience. So its pretty easy to see how such a thing is not part of experience and is therefore unreal. And finally, I'm saying that "the possibilites" that we can imagine are not real either. If we remove what is imagined, there is nothing left over. If "the possible" were real then it wouldn't matter if we could anticipate it or not. We'd just say there two categories of "the possible", the imaginable kind and the unimaginable kind. But I'm trying to show that this makes no sense. Remember the consciousness as a train metaphor Pirsig uses in ZAMM? Roughly, the idea is that the engine up front is the dynamic, cutting edge of experience. The box cars being pulled are the accumulated static patterns from the culture and from personal experience. (James and Bergson both offer similar ideas about the continuous flow of consciousness too, by the way.) In this metaphor, the leading edge of experience is the ever-present now but it is understood and interpreted in terms of what is in the static box cars. And so the present moment of experience enfolds both memory of the past and projections of the future. The now is endowed with what we've learned in the past and what it could mean in the future, but of course linear time is one of those static bits from the boxcar and most of the time it makes sense to think this way. The train moves down the track in one direction, after all. But its also important to notice that the so-called past and future are really more like memories and projections in the present. There is no past. By definition is it gone, no longer with us and the future has not yet arrived. What we have is imagination. We think about the past and future in the continuous now and that thinking is real, but the past and future per se are, by definition, outside of experience. So it is with the possible. You can imagine the possible, but then all you have is the hope or dread of what's possible, not the possibility itself, not the future itself. In your conception, it seems, the track out in front of the train splits into countless directions and as we move through experience they all collaspe and disappear as soon as they are not taken. But the in this metaphor, as I understand it, there is nothing out in front of the train and the direction of the track is not selected from an array of existing choices. That suggests a pre-existing reality that we may choose to visit or not. The front edge of experience can change direction but not by switching tracks. The track is created as the front edge moves along and that direction is effected by what is in the boxcars, by the static patterns that are used to interpret experience. I would also point out we are not free to the extent that we follow those static patterns rather than the front edge of experience. The idea of freedom in the MOQ is to follow that front edge of experience so that the direction of the train is spontaneous, without affectations, anticipations, expectations and desires. I think the whole idea of "the possible" is a word trap. It signifies nothing. DM said: Obviously there is alot of possibles we can imagine and consider that cannot be made actual. But we could imagine another world in which they could be. What we can't imagine, the unimaginable, certainly lies outside of the reality of our experience. dmb says: Yes, we can imagne another world. Again, this means imagination is real, not the other world. So it is with "the possible". We can actually imagine it, but that only makes it real as an image. Its a real thought, but it refers to nothing. I mean, outside of having imagined it, in what sense is "the possible" part of experience? We could say that "the possible" can be imagined and that it can be realized, but in both cases its not even correct to call it by that name. In that later case, it is not correct to call it "the possible" because it has become actual and in the former "the possible" exists as an activity of the imagination and so it is also actual rather than just possible. Answer that question, Dave. Outside of our projections and anticipations, where is "the possible" to be found in experience? Describe how "the possible" presents itself in experience OTHER than that. If the possible exists outside of imagination, then unimaginable possibilties must reside there too. See, by pointing out that unimaginable possibilities can't be known, I'm pointing out that the only thing we can know about "the possible" is what we imagine and there is nothing else behind it. dmb _________________________________________________________________ Mortgage rates as low as 4.625% - Refinance $150,000 loan for $579 a month. Intro*Terms https://www2.nextag.com/goto.jsp?product=100000035&url=%2fst.jsp&tm=y&search=mortgage_text_links_88_h27f6&disc=y&vers=743&s=4056&p=5117 moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
