Thanks again Arlo. > I think I'd say "betterness", or Quality, is pursued on all MOQ levels. > Sometimes these levels conflict in value. Yes. But there is clearly much disagreement, at least at moq.org, about these inter-level conflicts and their meaning. I wonder whether what attracts people to the MOQ is its explanation why things interact they way they do - always driven by a move toward betterness - and its silence on the meaning of the interactions, i.e., they can mean everything and they can mean nothing. It seems to me their meaning is dependent on the observer's perspective on the observed and in how they allow themselves to be affected by their observations and interactions.
Kevin --------------------------------- TV dinner still cooling? Check out "Tonight's Picks" on Yahoo! TV. moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
