[Case] On the other hand this did get me thinking about how such quantum weirdness might relate to the Big Bang. I have not really looked into this so it is probably nonsense but one thing about the Big Bang has always bothered me. If all that matter had all that gravity pulling in into a point how could it get loose? If you have all of the matter in the universe compressed into a Euclidian point and all of the force of physics had achieved symmetry and gravity fluctuated for even the tiniest fraction of a second, imagine the explosion that might result. [Ron] That's where my thought was headed with the "oneness" concept,in physical terms this interested me most, Absolute symetry, it almost had to have been pure energy because all that gravitational mass could'nt possibly escape itself with our understanding of physics, therefore it must have been more vast than it is now and all pure energy. But, Once you head down the path of absolutes with "oneness" you get a dichotomy Therefore the theory of the universe as a system process seems to work best, no beginning no end All revolving into itself in a thermodynamic way constantly refreshing and degrading So it would seem "oneness" rests in a dichodomy not in an absolute source. In this way you would term "source" as the process of everything, not so much a beginning point. Source then loses it's meaning as well as oneness in it's absolute sense.
moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
