Hi Mark A lot of my views are related to Heidegger and phenomenology, some good papers here:
http://consc.net/people.html#causation good introductions to Heidegger are the Cambridge Companion to Heidegger and a book called Heidegger: between good and evil. Well worth exploring. Time and what is dynamic are clearly inseparable. Heidegger's analysis of experience brings many refinements to what Pirsig offers us. David M Mark 12-03-07: Hi David M, Thank you for the link. I was thinking the moq refines Heidegger if applied carefully. I have been contemplating mapping DQ and sq onto Heidegger's ontology? The thing is, i really feel this can only work when sq is regarded as partially Dynamic - this way one may describe the, 'temporal smearing' ontology which is not SOM for Heidegger; Heidegger demolishes the Western metaphysical tradition by removing SOM at source. If this route is explored then what i've been regarding as a secondary ontology may make the mapping process work better? The books you mention are expensive but i shall try the library. Being and Time is expensive in itself. Best, Mark moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
