At 03:39 PM 3/15/2007, Platt wrote: >Quoting Magnus Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > I can agree that no one understands quantum mechanics, but that's > not the same > > thing as saying that it's fuzzy. The rules of QM must be > extremely well defined > > since they, despite their "unnatural" behavior, support the > inorganic level so > > rigidly. Perhaps this is the wrong time to mention this but this > is why I think > > QM should be a level of its own beneath the inorganic level. > >Hi Magnus, > >As one more familiar with QM than most you may find the following article >of interest. Subsequently I would be interested in your comments about it. >It's at: > >http://www.theamericanscholar.org/sp07/newtheory-lanza.html
Platt, This was a very interesting paper. One thing that I found very exciting was Lanza's mentioning, "It means that we make choices at every moment in what we can determine about the world. We cannot know with complete accuracy a quantum particle's motion and its position at the same time -- we have to choose one or the other. Thus the consciousness of the observer is decisive in determining what a particle does at any given moment." I have been thinking about 'reality = experience', and I thought yes, but on a deeper level reality is about quality, choice and feedback. Thank you Platt, it was a great article. Marsha moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
