[Micah] I do not advocate Solipsism, never have. [Arlo] Then you yourself don't understand what you are saying. As I'm not the only one here who has seen the underlying solipsism in what you say, attacking me about it really does nothing. But if it makes you feel better, go right ahead.
[Micah] Your post's symmetry was the balance of, on the one hand saying man is merely animal that is not special... [Arlo] Man is not special with regards to experiencing value, no. Does man make use of more complex symbols than other animals? Certainly. Does the world depend on man's observation to exist? Nope. We are a part of nature. [Micah] You childish method of "name calling" things you don't understand is tedious, but children can be tedious. [Arlo] Name calling? You mean saying you advocate solipsism is "name calling"?! Or can you point out where I've called you any names? I do appreciate the hypocrisy of your statement though. Since you've advocate that nothing exists that is not observed by man, I ask you this. Can you prove to me, Micah, that the world will continue if you are not here to observe it? moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
