> [Platt] > You assumption is that the laws of physics and cosmology are the only > credible explanations of the world and its creation. Time to break out of > your box with a careful reading of Lila. > > [Case] > Once again, since my reading is manifestly so sloppy, where does Pirsig > claim to be writing a work on cosmology and to be upending the laws of > physics. It seems a fair question.
[Platt] You're reading can't be that sloppy. Of course Pirsig makes no overt claim as you suggest. But he does claim there is more to the world that is dreamt of in the laws of physics and cosmology. He calls it "Quality." [Case] Then why do you raise it in opposition to prevailing theories of physics and cosmology? In what way does Pirsig's view even call these theories into question? moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
