Hi Marsha, I like that thought. That's a classic chicken and egg, where neither comes first.
The two things are complementary, (better more than two, or more than one complementary pair even better, even better still that your pair involves one artistic / aethetic and one intellectual / rational.) Moving between states is important - dynamic. Neither of the states is necessarily more important than the other, they are mutually important. Being stuck in any one may be equally bad. Regards Ian On 4/10/07, MarshaV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Greetings, > > Often it has seemed that thinking is just lateral drift until the > next painting. But now it seems the case that painting is lateral > drift until the next thought. > > m > > > > > moq_discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ > moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
