Case Could we suggest that it is relationship that brings about causation/patterns? Behaviour is only offered when it is called for from one being to another? Relationship gives actuality to what is otherwise latent/potential behaviour?
David M ----- Original Message ----- From: "Case" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2007 7:48 PM Subject: Re: [MD] Heads or tails? > [David M] > The real mystery is why are there patterns and repeats? > > [Case] > Actually I see that as moving past the horror and into the pretty cool > part. > Patterns are relationships. We see them appearing in otherwise chaotic > systems. I mentioned this in some detail in a post in the Crystallizing > Chaos thread on 10 September 2006. I don't want to be repetitious but here > is the executive summary: > > "While GOFC may exist, any set of relationships that occur in it, limit > its > freedom. It becomes less dynamic spontaneously and acausally. Or at least > cause and effect emerge as forms of relationship. > > Once you get a set of relatively static relationships going, even a > chaotic > system begins to behave deterministically if not predictably. Harmony, > resonance, "equal to" "greater than", "less than", "and", "or", "nor" are > all examples of types of static relationship." > > moq_discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ > moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
