> [Krimel] > Which is exactly why I am not interested in aesthetics and do not think > that philosophy, science or politics should be judged by purely > aesthetic criteria. Rather they are to be judged on a pragmatic basis, > according to what works. >
DM: But knowing what is possible is not enough, you still have to decide whether to realize it in the actual or not. To bring into being or not? [Krimel] I may have some options with regards to what I make of the screaming drunks and crack heads outside my office. But they are actually there and short of a futile call to law enforcement, they are likely to remain out there. I suppose this is the sense in which we can exercise a bit of control over our perception but much less control over our sensations. Still I hear them holler but I am starting to like it. If one answers the question, "to be or not to be" in the affirmative, the next question is, "what to be?" moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
