David,
Thank you very much. I did get as far as clear definitions, but after that much confusion. Your post has help considerable. Presently, I have one additional question. Would the source of knowledge be exclusively the Intellectual Level, or Social & Intellectual Levels (both being of the mind)? Both seems right because there was knowledge before the Intellectual Level evolved, but that might reflect my misunderstanding. Marsha At 08:05 AM 6/22/2007, you wrote: >Hi Marsha, > >I find it confusing too. And I've put off looking into it further, >but now is as good as time as any to look into it. So I tried the >dictionary, it wasn't any clearer, so I tried the poor mans >encyclopaedia - Wikipedia. It actually gives both concepts with many >example questions so I'll answer a select few of them below. > >Before I do however, I should mention I don't think there is a single >question which can divide both concepts like you request as both >concepts are their own questions themselves. > > > >Epistemology: >============= >"What do you know?" > >That Quality is fundamental and the source of all things. From this >quality a metaphysics is born called the MOQ. > >"How do you know it?" > > From experience. > >"What is knowledge?" > >Knowledge is static patterns of Intellectual value. > > >Ontology: >======== >"What is existence?" > >static quality capable of apprehending DQ. > >"Is existence a property?" > >Among other things, yes. > >"What does it mean to say something does not exist?" > >It means you are not talking empirically. Because some thing is >static quality and thus it exists. > >"Why are we here?" > >Because of good. > >"Why does anything exist, rather than nothingness?" > >Mu. Both anything and nothing exists. > > >It would appear to me Marsha, that epistemology is about the source >of knowledge. Thus, the MOQ perspective is that epistemologically, >quality is the source of Intellectual patterns of value. Meanwhile, >ontology is about the source of existence. The MOQ perspective on >this is that ontologically quality is the source of everything. > >Hope this makes things clearer for you. > >Cheers, > >David. > >On 22/06/2007, at 9:01 PM, MarshaV wrote: > > > > > Greetings, > > > > Hmmmm > > > > I'm looking for the differences in evaluating the MOQ from a > > ontological p-o-v versus an epistemological p-o-v. Maybe with an > > example of a question that might demonstrate the difference in > > answers. I find this confusing. > > > > Marsha > > > > moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
