On 25 Nov 2000, at 13:42, S.E. Reames wrote:
wrote:
> Hello again MOQers..
Dear S.E. Reames.
Are you "Sojourner" of old? I remember you well in that case - An
articulate quality spokesman (in my "report book":) who was much
missed. It's great when old acquaintances drop in again. Hope you
stay.
> I'll skip the lengthy intro - but since I first
> read ZAMM and then LILA, it has been about 7
> years - and the MOST pragmatic and "tangible"
> use I have ever had with MOQ is that it is the
> single most helpful tool to understanding relationships
> between human beings - whether on a larger scale
> or down to the "couple" level.
I don't have the old exchange in this machine, but your "sojourn"
was not long - some months in 1998??
> Far from promulgating standard psychological
> "rationales" for behavior (i.e. everything is
> due to early childhood/in the womb influences)
> it is a clear, easy-to-use method for understanding
> "why" people do what they do - including yourself.
You are just right, about the psychological-rationales extra right.
It's SUBJECTIVITY (tried) objectified. God, what a sky-hook.
> Everything else just follows as easy as you please.
> Sorry for the oversimplification but I cannot help
> but feel some kind of sympathy for those whom I've
> read stating "MOQ has lost its efficacy for me" when
> I find it to be a truly dynamic tool for exactly
> what is most important to me - my daily life.
> Thanks and hi to those who remember me.
Same to you Sojourner.
Bo
(embarrassingly still around)
MOQ.org - http://www.moq.org
