Tomorrow I'll post a CALL FOR VOTES. At that time you can state your preference for next month's topic. Our contenders (including a last-minute entry from me) are: 1. Todd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Let us speak of Truth, Can the Unchanging Truth have a Fluid nature? Can this nature be related to Pirsig's inquiry into Values? 2. David Buchanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Can we see an ideology in Lila? What are the political implications of the MOQ? 3. Bodvar Skutvik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject/Object Metaphysics makes us look for the reason for everything in one of its two realms--for instance the culture vs. nature debate. As the Metaphysics of Quality rejects the subject/object division as fundamental, where does it look for (and find) an explanation? 4. Ken Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Good is a noun. Good as a noun rather than an adjective is all the MoQ is about ... if you had to reduce the whole MoQ to a single sentence, that would be it." What did Pirsig mean by this statement? 5. Keith Gillette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> How does the Metaphysics of Quality come down on the issue of abortion? 6. Taner Akdeniz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> If every classification or identification effort puts Dynamic quality into a static form, can the universe have more than one Dynamic quality? Please consider these entries but hold your votes until I post the CALL FOR VOTES tomorrow. Cheers, Keith ______________________________________________________________________ Keith A. Gillette <http://www.iglobal.net/pub/gillette/> MOQ.org - http://www.moq.org
