There are so many good topics that have been suggested in previous months that it seem 
a 
waste to suggest new ones until a few more of the old ones are used up.
Hopefully the original authors won't mind me resurrecting their topic suggestions - 
and 
hopefully I've attributed the correct authors to the relevant suggestions


(Original author Philip Wigg)
'Lila' was described in one it's reviews as 'having little to add but more dull 
taxonomy'. Given 
that trying to solve moral dilemmas using MOQ seems to create as much debate and 
confusion as not using MOQ and there also seems to be considerable confusion as to the 
interpretion of Pirsig's levels, is this a fair criticism?


(Original author Denis Poisson)
To further explore the Social and Intelectual Levels in terms of how they work and 
their 
composition. Also, if DNA is the "machine code" or interface between the inorganic and 
the 
biological levels, what form does the interface between the Biological and the Social 
levels 
take and similarly the interface between the Social and the Intellectual levels.

(Original author Kevin Sanchez)
How would Pirsig unite modernity and postmodernity. Chomsky advocates modernity 
claiming we need morality to legitimize our actions and justice is the highest ideal 
of 
society. Foucault advocates postmodernity claiming that despite our need of it, 
morality doesn't exists and that society defines its highest ideal as it wishes.  It 
seems 
Pirsig can't appease the moderns because of his reliance on experience instead of 
logic and 
he can't appease the postmoderns because of his acceptance of a universal morality 
instead of particular morality.




MOQ.org - http://www.moq.org

Reply via email to