I vote for #2, even though #9 has already won.
I concur with Marco's assessment below. Number 9 amounts to a "slow reading list",
which is a great idea, but I think something quite separate from MOQ_Discuss. Many
such lists exist for other texts and we'd probably do well to look at their structure,
as I think they have a unique set of rules to guide discussion.
At 10:31 PM 2/28/00 +0100, Marco wrote:
>Moffers,
>
>it seems that number nine is going to be the winner. I also love this idea,
>but I want to make some considerations.
>Don't you think that this topic is going to change the nature of MF? Don't
>you think there's the risk to lose MF discussions along one year, and fall
>in a "philosophology" trap: an infinite discussion fully centered only in
>RMP and MOQ?
>
>So I say: ok, let's try for one month! But then I suggest to create a new
>space of discussion dedicated to it.
>
>So I vote for number nine, just for one month.
>
>
MOQ.org - http://www.moq.org
