Hi All-

I'm responding here to Jess's question below, I don't have a direct e-mail for Jess to respond off-line.

Tne IMP CVAGen pogram does output the PW scores in the same format as PCAGen. I need to update the CVAGen manual.

As long as the subject has come up, would users find it helpful to have a header line in the file, labeling each column of the output? I did not put this in original version, as it seemed easier to import the file into other programs if it did not have the header. Does anyone have any comments? Headers or no?

-Dave


H. David Sheets, PhD
Dept of Physics, Canisius College
2001 Main St
Buffalo NY 14208

---- Original message ----
Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2006 13:56:04 -0400
From: morphmet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: IMP Question To: [email protected]

Hello group --

Please forgive my relatively simplistic question, but my working group is looking for a quick confirmation on a question regarding IMP. We are using the CVA portion of the software package, and we wanted to confirm that, like the PCA portion, the partial warp scores are reported in the output in the following order (with a hypothetical 4 components, uniform components, and centroid):

X4 Y4 X3 Y3 X2 Y2 X1 Y1 UNIX UNIY CS

(there has been some confusion within our group with some thinking that the order in the output of warp scores would be X1 Y1 X2 Y2 X3 Y3 X4 Y4 UNIX UNIY CS).

A quick off-line email would be SO appreciated...again, I apologize for the rather simplistic question, but we wanted to confirm the correct assignment of the PWs in the output generated by IMP.

Thank you!
Cheers,

Jess White
Western Illinois University
Department of Sociology and Anthropology

_________________________________________________________________
On the road to retirement? Check out MSN Life Events for advice on how to
get there! http://lifeevents.msn.com/category.aspx?cid=Retirement



--
Replies will be sent to the list.
For more information visit http://www.morphometrics.org




--
Replies will be sent to the list.
For more information visit http://www.morphometrics.org

Reply via email to