Dear All,
this is out now (first link allowing to get a pdf but only for a day; second link for those who have subscriptions - of course, send me an email if you don't make it to get a reprint either way).
https://rdcu.be/b7zXr
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00435-020-00499-w

This paper is about questions such as: does "high density morphometrics" really equate to accuracy? Does sliding make semilandmarks into landmarks? Is geometric correspondence the same as biological equivalence? Is there no problem with the 'within a configuration' tests of modularity/integration? I believe the simple answer to all these questions is: NO. However, the article is neither against semilandmarks nor against testing for modularity/integration. It's against unsupported misleading claims and overstatement. Many methods can be useful (if important for the specific study question) even with limitations, but the limitations should be stated and not be overlooked.

I take the chance to thank again the editors, reviewers and all those with whom I have discussed these issues over the years (regardless of how much we agree or disagree).

I hope you're all well, despite the difficult times we're in.
All the best

Andrea



--
Dr. Andrea Cardini
Researcher, Dipartimento di Scienze Chimiche e Geologiche, Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Via Campi, 103 - 41125 Modena - Italy
tel. 0039 059 4223140

Adjunct Associate Professor, Centre for Forensic Anthropology, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley WA 6009, Australia

E-mail address: [email protected], [email protected]
WEBPAGE: https://sites.google.com/site/alcardini/home/main

FREE Yellow BOOK on Geometric Morphometrics: https://tinyurl.com/2013-Yellow-Book

ESTIMATE YOUR GLOBAL FOOTPRINT: http://www.footprintnetwork.org/en/index.php/GFN/page/calculators/
SUPPORT: secondwarning.org

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Morphmet" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/morphmet2/dcac1c85-8872-0d60-5cb8-97d7ad956ab6%40gmail.com.

Reply via email to