Dear morphometricians,
There are some landmarks in my study that I couldn't identify (damaged material) in a reasonable number of specimens (some of those "missing" landmarks in more than 25% of them). What I would like to ask is there any "reasonable"/maximum percentage of missing data in order to carry out a "valid" shape analysis? Thanks in advance Luis Luis Azevedo Rodrigues Museu Nacional de Historia Natural (Mineralogia e Geologia) Natural History Museum Rua da Escola Politécnica, 58 P-1250-102 Lisboa PORTUGAL e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Museum http://www.mnhn.ul.pt/geologia/geologia.htm ICNODINOS - http://www.mnhn.ul.pt/dinos/public_html/index.html Phone: +351 21 392 18 35 FAX: +351 21 390 58 50 -- Replies will be sent to the list. For more information visit http://www.morphometrics.org
