-------- Original Message --------
Subject:        Re:urgent:separating the shape from the size
Date:   Tue, 27 May 2008 06:57:36 -0700 (PDT)
From:   ali mahmood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To:       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:     [email protected]






Dear Thiago



I am very happy to be in contact with you again , in your previous
massage you describe the way to assess the relation between shape and
size by using the regression. I know that the regression is use to
predict some values from the others, so who I can describe the relation
between size and shape by the regression equation?



yours





 Ali
--- On *Sun, 5/11/08, morphmet /<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>/*
wrote:

    From: morphmet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
    Subject: Re:urgent:separating the shape from the size
    To: "morphmet" <[email protected]>
    Date: Sunday, May 11, 2008, 7:37 PM

    -------- Original Message --------
    Subject:    Re:urgent:separating the shape from the size
    Date:       Sun, 11 May 2008 04:41:19 -0700 (PDT)
    From:       ali mahmood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
    Reply-To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    To:         [email protected]



    Dear Thiago



    Thank you indeed for your kind information, do you mean that I need to
    do the Principal component analysis and then use the engine values as a
    determinants for the shape?, my data are 3D do you have any other
suggested software? I am waiting for your helpful answer,thank you again.



    Ali

--- On *Sat, 5/10/08, morphmet /<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>/*
    wrote:

         From: morphmet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
         Subject: Re:urgent:separating the shape from the size
         To: "morphmet" <[email protected]>
         Date: Saturday, May 10, 2008, 9:37 PM

         -------- Original Message --------
         Subject:       Re:urgent:separating the shape from the size
         Date:  Sat, 10 May 2008 07:09:37 -0700 (PDT)
         From:  thimacek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
         To:    morphmet <[email protected]>



         Ali,

         By using geometric morphometrics, you are already separating
    "size"
         and
         "shape" most, if not all of the time. If you used Landmark
    methods
         (digitization followed by GPA), you'll have come to a number of
         'Partial
         Warps' and possibly 'Relative Warps', in addition to the
    Centroid
         Size.
The centroid size is a measure of size, while the Partial Warps are the variables containing the Shape information. It should be noted that all Partial Warps should be analyzed together, as each one of them alone
         normally have no biological meaning per se.
The Relative warps are a sort of PCA (principal component analysis)
    done
on the Partial Warps, and as such one may be able to draw conclusions by analyzing only the first among them, which represent larger amounts
         of the sample's total variation.

         If you want to look for correlation between size and shape - i.e.
allometry - you may make a multivariate regression using Centroid Size (the size variable) as the independent variable and the Partial Warps
         (all of them, which together represent shape) as dependent
    variables. If
you're making your analysis in 2D, you can do this using the TPSRegr
         program by Rohlf.

         I hope this helps!

         Thiago

           >
           >
           > -------- Original Message --------
           > Subject: urgent:separating the shape from the size
           > Date: Sat, 10 May 2008 04:53:11 -0700 (PDT)
           > From: ali mahmood
           > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
           > To: [email protected]
           >
           >
           >
           > Dear Friends
           >
           >
           >
           > Thank you for your kind help, I send before a question
    regarding the
           > correlation between the the *size* of face and dental arch in
    geometric
> morphometric means ,and I received the answer from some Friends
    as the
> told me that I need to use the *centroid size* for both of them to > calculate the correlation for the *size * ,but no one answer my
    question
           > regarding the correlation between the *shape *of the face and
    dental
           > arch (because I would like to separate the* size* from the
    *shape, *so
> what I need to calculate for the_ face_ and then to the_ dental
    arch_ to
           > be used as variables in the correlation for the *shape*?
           >
           >
           >
           >
           >
           > Ali R Al-khatib
           >
           >
           >

------------------------------------------------------------------------
           > Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo!
    Mobile. Try
           > it now.
           > <

    evt="51733/*http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ";
         us.rd.yahoo.com>
           >
           > >
           >
           > --
           > Replies will be sent to the list.
           > For more information visit http://www.morphometrics.org
           >

         --
         Replies will be sent to the list.
         For more information visit http://www.morphometrics.org



------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try
    it now.

<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=51733/*http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ


      >

    --
    Replies will be sent to the list.
    For more information visit http://www.morphometrics.org



--
Replies will be sent to the list.
For more information visit http://www.morphometrics.org

Reply via email to