-------- Original Message --------
Subject: RE: formatting data [in Morphologika -the mod]
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 10:03:15 -0800 (PST)
From: Steven Wang <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>

Hi Alex,
Here is an example of what I use for headers in ml, along with some
explanations.

[individuals]
96
[landmarks]
14
[dimensions]
3
[groups]
alph 50 aust 46 -- I use a four-letter abbreviation for every populations
m 40 f 50 u 6 -- I use m=male, f=female, u=unknown
H.e 2 H.n 2 H.s 8 H.s.s 530 -- abbreviation for genus and species, in this
case, for various human lineages, e.g., H.s = Homo sapiens
NAmerica 50 Australia 46 -- regions and the number of specimens from that
region
[labels]
population sex species region
[labelvalues]
alph m H.s.s Namerica
alph f H.s.s NAmerica
alph f H.s.s NAmerica
alph m H.s.s Namerica
aust m H.s.s Australia
etc...
[names]
alph001m -- instead of using museum catalogue number, which can vary a lot
among institutions, I simply convert it to a number, three digits in the
case because I will never collect more than 100 specimens/population
alph002f
alph003f
aust001m
etc...
[rawpoints]
'alph001m
-12.07 -60.2385 -17.694
etc...


You could have as many classfiers for your data as you like. It all depends
on how you plan to partition the data during the analysis.
I found that it's so much easier to create wireframe in MorphoJ--you have
the option of simply dragging a line between desired landmarks.
Additionally, it provides three standard orientions (frontal view, lateral
view, and superior view), which is adequate for most of my analyses.

Have fun!
Steve


-----Original Message-----
From: morphmet [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2009 7:34 AM
To: morphmet
Subject: Re: formatting data [in Morphologika -the mod]



-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: formatting data [in Morphologika -the mod]
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 05:35:50 -0800 (PST)
From: andrea cardini <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]

Alex, you can use any name you like. Probably better if it's a single word
(like specimen_1, specimen_2 etc. or just 1 2 etc.). Also unknown is fine
for sex.
Cheers

Andrea

At 08:05 26/02/2009 -0500, you wrote:


-------- Original Message --------
Subject:        formatting data
Date:   Thu, 26 Feb 2009 04:59:09 -0800 (PST)
From:   Alexander J. Nevgloski Jr <[email protected]>
Reply-To:       [email protected]
To:     [email protected]



Hello, I am trying to format my data so that I can run an analysis. In
the 'how to' section of Morphologika the names of the specimens are
'specimen 1, specimen 2, specimen 3, ... '

My question is can I use some other kind of name, as in the museum
number, or some other designator?

And what do I do with specimens where sex is unknown? If I have 'male,
female, male, female, unknown, male, female...' in my list for sex
labelvalues will this cause confusion in the program?

Thank you, Alex               [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>



--
Replies will be sent to the list.
For more information visit http://www.morphometrics.org




Dr. Andrea Cardini

Lecturer in Animal Biology
Museo di Paleobiologia e dell'Orto Botanico, Universitá di Modena e Reggio
Emilia
via Università 4, 41100, Modena, Italy
tel: 0039 059 2056532; fax: 0039 059 2056535

Honorary Fellow
Functional Morphology and Evolution Unit, Hull York Medical School
University of Hull, Cottingham Road, Hull, HU6 7RX, UK
University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK

E-mail address: [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected]
http://hyms.fme.googlepages.com/drandreacardini
http://ads.ahds.ac.uk/catalogue/archive/cerco_lt_2007/overview.cfm#metadata

More on publications at:
http://www.cons-dev.org/marm/MARM/EMARM/framarm/framarm.html
CLICK ON THE LETTER C AND LOOK FOR "CARDINI"
http://hyms.fme.googlepages.com/dr.sarahelton-publications
LOOK FOR "CARDINI"










--
Replies will be sent to the list.
For more information visit http://www.morphometrics.org



--
Replies will be sent to the list.
For more information visit http://www.morphometrics.org

Reply via email to