-------- Original Message --------
Subject: David laserscanner
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 10:27:46 -0700 (PDT)
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
CC: morphmet <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>

Wow...it seems amazing, and supercheap....the best
would be if someone made a trial; if the precision is
really 0.2 mm, as declarated...it will be the most
used in the future; see here for a demonstration
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xK5eYhpBtQc
all the best
Paolo






-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [budget 3D scanner? - the mod]
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 06:49:59 -0700 (PDT)
From: Dennis E. Slice <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
References: <[email protected]>
<[email protected]>

I wasn't familiar with that particular device, but if
you want to go
really low-buck...got milk?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XSrW-wAWZe4

-dslice

morphmet wrote:
Dear Morphmetters,

      I thank all of you who responded to my post of
earlier
 this month seeking a memory prosthesis on the topic
of
 absurdly cheap surface scanners.  Most of you said,
 in effect, we don't know, but we're sure
interested,
 please report ... But one kind respondent
 pointed me to a website,
http://www.david-laserscanner.com/,
 that seems to offer an actual product priced within
a factor of
 the square root of 10 of what I was remembering.

       Does anybody out there have any experience
with the
 David Laserscanner, either as software or in kit
form?
 Odd that nobody from that company is on this
mailing list,
 but that would be easy to remedy, wouldn't it?

                                      Fred Bookstein


morphmet wrote:


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: could you post?
Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 20:51:57 +0200
From: Fred Bookstein
<[email protected]>
CC: [email protected]

                                          May 13
'09
 Dear morphmetters,

       This is probably cosmic-ray damage.  I was
in some conversation
 within the last few weeks during which some
speaker mentioned a
 way of setting up a not totally useless surface
scanner for something
 like $200 in components.  Was it someone in this
news group who
 said that, or have any of you heard of a piece of
equipment fitting
 that description?  I may have been in Chicago, at
the AAPA meeting,
 or perhaps not: the memory is not accompanied by a
backdrop.

      Does anybody out there have knowledge of what
I'm remembering
 so hopelessly vaguely?  You can reply to the news
group or directly
to me,
 Fred Bookstein, [email protected].  Thanks
in advance.

==========




--
Dennis E. Slice
Associate Professor
Dept. of Scientific Computing
Florida State University
Dirac Science Library
Tallahassee, FL 32306-4120
        -
Guest Professor
Department of Anthropology
University of Vienna
        -
Software worth having/learning/using...
  Linux (Operating System: Ubuntu, CentOS, openSUSE,
etc.)
  OpenOffice (Office Suite:
http://www.openoffice.org/)
  R package (Stats/Graphics environment:
http://www.r-project.org/)
  Eclipse (Java/C++/etc IDE: http://www.eclipse.org/)
========================================================



--
Replies will be sent to the list.
For more information visit
http://www.morphometrics.org






--
Replies will be sent to the list.
For more information visit http://www.morphometrics.org

Reply via email to