-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: The best 3D scanner
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 20:08:07 GMT
From: Andy Grass <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
References: <[email protected]>

Ryosuke Motani's lab at U.C. Davis has a laser scanner that they use
for small objects.  You can see examples at http://3dmuseum.org
They'd probably be some of the best people to point you in the right
direction for hardware and software.


On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 11:58 AM, morphmet
<[email protected]> wrote:


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: The best 3D scanner
Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 14:38:49 -0500
From: [email protected]
To: morphmet <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>

Dear friends,

Which is the best 3D laser scanner for small structures such as frog,
rodent and bat skulls? These are objects with complex surfaces and a
length range between 20-50 mm.

Let's say that cost is not a factor to be considered.

There are currently three options that I am considering:

1) David Laser Scanner

http://www.david-laserscanner.com/

2) NextEngine 3d Scanner

https://www.nextengine.com/

3) Immersion RSI 3D Laser for Microscribe MX digitizer (6 df)

http://www.microscan-3d.com/
http://www.3d-microscribe.com/MicroScan%20Page.htm

All models report their maximum resolution at standard conditions, but
I would like to know if anyone in the forum has experience working with
these contraptions on small-sized skulls for geometric morphometric
applications, or even smaller objects such as insects or other
invertebrates.

Thanks for the advice

Pablo

Pablo Jarrin
Ph. D. candidate
Dept. of Biology / Boston University
M. A. Ecology Behavior and Evolution
Boston Univ.
Director
Yasuni Research Station
Escuela de Ciencias Biológicas
Pont. Univ. Católica del Ecuador.






--
Replies will be sent to the list.
For more information visit http://www.morphometrics.org





--
Andy Grass
Grad Student
Department of Geoscience
University of Iowa



--
Replies will be sent to the list.
For more information visit http://www.morphometrics.org

Reply via email to