-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: MorphoJ visualisations
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 13:08:35 -0500
From: Chris Klingenberg <[email protected]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
Organization: University of Manchester
To: [email protected]
References: <[email protected]>

Dear Tim

Thanks for pointing out the weak spot in the MorphoJ documentation. I've
just posted a slightly revised version, which will also be packaged with
the new version of MorphoJ that's currently in the works (with some
extra bits and bobs).

The 'secret' of the visualization of shape changes associated with
canonical variate (CV) axes is a regression of shape on the respective
CV scores, as it was suggested by Rohlf et al. (Rohlf, F.J., Loy, A. &
Corti, M. 1996 Morphometric analysis of Old World Talpidae (Mammalia,
Insectivora) unsing partial-warp scores. Systematic Biology 45, 344–362).

The scale factor for CV shape changes is in units of Mahalanobis
distance. This is the shape change per unit of within-group shape
variation in that direction; this is the same as the units of the axes
of the scatter plots of CV scores (e.g. the default of 10.0 is a change
of 10 units in the positive direction along the respective CV axis).

I hope this helps.

Best wishes,
Chris



morphmet wrote:


-------- Original Message --------
Subject:     MorphoJ visualisations
Date:     Tue, 16 Feb 2010 11:48:01 -0500
From:     Tim tkint <[email protected]>
To:     <[email protected]>



Dear all,



I am doing a geometric morphometric study on sexual dimorphism in
cichlids. I like using MorphoJ, but I am a little confused about the
visualisations. First of all, what exactly does the scale factor mean?
Is this value linked to the coordinates of the specimens along the axes:
(e.g. scale factor 10 corresponds to shape at score 10 on axis) or is it
a multiplication of the total shape change along an axis?

And what is the ‘secret’ behind the visualisation of the shape changes
along CVA-axes? (Several publications have mentioned that CVA-results
are difficult to visualize directly because a CVA re-scales axes using
within-group variation.)



Kind regards,

Tim.



___________________



Tim tkint

Ghent University

Evolutionary Morphology of Vertebrates

K.L. Ledeganckstraat 35, B-9000 Gent, Belgium

tel: +32 9 264 52 33

E-mail: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>

http://www.fun-morph.ugent.be/



--
***************************************************************
Christian Peter Klingenberg
Faculty of Life Sciences
The University of Manchester
Michael Smith Building
Oxford Road
Manchester M13 9PT
United Kingdom

Telephone: +44 161 275 3899
Fax: +44 161 275 5082
E-mail: [email protected]
Web: http://www.flywings.org.uk
Skype: chris_klingenberg
***************************************************************



--
For now, new message AND replies should be sent to:

[email protected]

/* Replies will be sent to the list. */
For more information visit http://www.morphometrics.org

Reply via email to