-------- Original Message --------
Subject:        Re: Angle differences in PC axes
Date:   Sat, 26 Mar 2011 00:06:52 -0400
From:   Lissa Tallman <[email protected]>
To:     [email protected]



Thanks to everyone (as always) for the thoughtful responses!  I have
been working in degrees, but I had not considered the issue of the
vectors moving towards the z-axis.  In that light, my data make more sense.

Lissa

On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 3:43 PM, morphmet
<[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:



    -------- Original Message --------
    Subject: Re: Angle differences in PC axes
    Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 15:33:20 -0400
    From: Dennis E. Slice <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>>
    To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>

    Lissa, Hi!...


    On 3/25/11 8:42 AM, morphmet wrote:



        -------- Original Message --------
        Subject: Angle differences in PC axes
        Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 14:49:43 -0400
From: Lissa Tallman <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
        To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>



        Hello Morphmetricians,

        I am currently working on a project that compares ontogenetic
        trajectories in postcranial elements of extant apes using geometric
        morphometrics. I performed both a common GPA on the entire
        sample, as
        well as individual GPAs on each taxon and I've looked at the
        results in


    Comparing PCs of groups not jointly superimposed is not meaningful. The
    coefficients for GPA PCs are for individual landmark coordinates and
    would be orientation-specific. Relative warps doesn't help, either,
    since the basis vectors are sensitive functions of the mean
configuration. Orienting to manually adjusted fish PCs (all heads to the
    left kind of thing) might help a little, but best not to do it at all.
    What should be done is jointly superimpose all groups, then compute PCs
    for each in that common space.


both Procrustes shape space and Procrustes form space. In both cases
        (particularly once centroid size is included, of course) the
        bulk of the
        shape change occurs along the first PC axis. I would like to
        determine


    Almost by definition, except for the subtlety that in form space PC 1
    could represent overwhelming size variation in the face of isometry.


        the differences in the angles of those PC axes.

        In theory, I believe I need to calculate the dot product of the
        eigenvectors (as the sum of all Ux*Vx), and then take the arccos
        of that
value. If the dot product is greater than 1, I've been assuming that
        indicates an angle of over 180 degres, and I've been subtracting
        2 to
        take the arcccos of the complimentary angle, and then
        subtracting that
from 180. The problem is that the data from these calculations don't
        make geometric sense. If I have three taxa, and I am comparing all
        three of them in a pairwise manner, the sum of the two smaller
        angles
        should equal the sum of the largest angle - but that is not what
        I am


    Why? Only if all vectors were coplanar would you expect such a
    relationship. Think of two vectors along x, y (90 degrees) and a third
    at 45 degrees in their plane. Rotating the third one out of the plane
    and towards the z axis increases the two smaller angles, but not the
    third until they are all 90 degrees.

    Do check your radians vs. degrees as Dr. Adams suggested.

    Best, ds


        getting. I am wondering if I need to apply some kind of
        transformation
        to my vectors to make sure that they begin in the same place? I did
        calculate the magnitude of each vector, and they are all just
        trivially
        different from 1.

        Lissa


    --
    Dennis E. Slice
    Associate Professor
    Dept. of Scientific Computing
    Florida State University
    Dirac Science Library
    Tallahassee, FL 32306-4120
            -
    Guest Professor
    Department of Anthropology
    University of Vienna
            -
    Software worth having/learning/using...
      Linux (Operating System: Ubuntu, CentOS, openSUSE, etc.)
      OpenOffice (Office Suite: http://www.openoffice.org/)
      R package (Stats/Graphics environment: http://www.r-project.org/)
      Eclipse (Java/C++/etc IDE: http://www.eclipse.org/)
      Netbeans (Java/C++/etc IDE: http://netbeans.org/)
      Zotero (FireFox bibliographic extension: http://www.zotero.org/)
    ========================================================





--
Lissa Tallman, Ph.D.
Post-Doctoral Associate, CUNY/Lehman
@ Department of Vertebrate Paleontology
American Museum of Natural History
79th St. at Central Park West
New York, NY 10024
phone: 212-769-5553

Adjunct Faculty
Hunter College
Department of Anthropology

email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>

Reply via email to