----- Forwarded message from "F. James Rohlf" -----

Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 11:53:50 -0400
From: "F. James Rohlf"
Reply-To: ro...@life.bio.sunysb.edu
Subject: RE: problem with RMA regression
To: morphmet@morphometrics.org

Are your computations based on nice homogeneous and large sample sizes? For small sample sizes and messy data there can be large fluctuations in the observed slopes.

 

----------------------

F. James Rohlf, John S. Toll Professor, Stony Brook University

The much revised 4th editions of Biometry and Statistical Tables are now available:

http://www.whfreeman.com/Catalog/product/biometry-fourthedition-sokal

http://www.whfreeman.com/Catalog/product/statisticaltables-fourthedition-rohlf

P Please consider the environment before printing this email

 

 

From: morphmet_modera...@morphometrics.org [mailto:morphmet_modera...@morphometrics.org]
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2012 6:28 AM
To: morphmet@morphometrics.org
Subject: problem with RMA regression

 

----- Forwarded message from mahdi rabie -----

Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 02:41:32 -0400
From: mahdi rabie
Reply-To: mahdi rabie
Subject: problem with RMA regression
To: "morphmet@morphometrics.org"

Dear All

 

I have a problem with RMA regression (Reduced Major Axis regression) and would be very grateful if somebody help me.

I'm studying on allometry of somatic and sexual traits of two Noctuid moths. I want to calculate slope B of regression line for log transformed data for calculation of kind of allometry relationship (isometry or negative allometry or positive allometry ). 

I first calculated it by OLS regression and found negative allometry for some sexual traits and isometry and negative allometry for somatics. Again, I calculated B by method RMA by using RMA Software. I found isometry for often somatic traits and positive for some of them and positive allometry for sexual traits ! It is strange results ! as in literature all authors report negative allometry and isometry for sexual traits. I don't know my calculations are incorrect ? or software is corrupted ? or,  I found a new phenomenon (positive allometry for sexual traits)?

 

Thank You



----- End forwarded message -----

 

 



----- End forwarded message -----

 

 



----- End forwarded message -----





----- End forwarded message -----



Reply via email to