----- Forwarded message from Paolo Piras
<paolo.pi...@uniroma3.it> -----
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013
18:48:17 -0400
From: Paolo Piras <paolo.pi...@uniroma3.it>
Reply-To: Paolo Piras <paolo.pi...@uniroma3.it>
Subject: RE:
2B-PLS vs PLSR
To: "morphmet@morphometrics.org"
<morphmet@morphometrics.org>
This is what you want
best
paolo
Partial Least Squares (PLS) methods for neuroimaging: A tutorial and review
Anjali Krishnan
a, Lynne J. Williams b, Anthony Randal McIntosh c,d,⁎, Hervé Abdi a,⁎NeuroImage 56 (2011) 455
–475
Inviato: giovedì 25 aprile 2013 23.45
A: morphmet@morphometrics.org
Oggetto: 2B-PLS vs PLSR
----- Forwarded message from Rodrigo Lima <rodrigo.l...@mail.mcgill.ca>
-----
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 09:57:46 -0400
From: Rodrigo Lima <rodrigo.l...@mail.mcgill.ca>
Reply-To: Rodrigo Lima <rodrigo.l...@mail.mcgill.ca>
Subject: 2B-PLS vs PLSR
To: "morphmet@morphometrics.org" <morphmet@morphometrics.org>
I have a question about the PLS analysis and I would be very thankful for any insight provided.
What is the difference between two-block PLS (as in Rohf and Corti 2000) and PLS regression (PLSR) implemented in the pls package in R (Mevik and Wehrens 2007)? I'm trying to relate skull shape to climatic variables, which one would be more appropriate in this case?
Thank you,
Rodrigo
----- End forwarded message -----
----- End forwarded message -----
