----- Forwarded message from andrea cardini <alcard...@gmail.com> -----

     Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 05:02:44 -0400
      From: andrea cardini <alcard...@gmail.com>
      Reply-To: andrea cardini <alcard...@gmail.com>
      Subject: Re: Sample size, hybrids, and R
      To: morphmet@morphometrics.org

Quick comments below, Sam. Sorry for the rush. 
It's my teaching semester and have very little time. 

At 03:38 19/03/2014, you wrote:

>----- Forwarded message from "Samuel F. Rizza" 
><samuel.ri...@humboldt.edu> -----
>
>Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2014 15:50:42 -0800
>From: "Samuel F. Rizza" <samuel.ri...@humboldt.edu>
>Reply-To: samuel.ri...@humboldt.edu
>Subject: Sample size, hybrids, and R
>To: morphmet_modera...@morphometrics.org
>
>Hi all,
>
>I am a graduate student looking at morphometrics 
>and genetics of coastal cutthroat trout(CCT), 
>steelhead trout(SH), and their hybrids(HY). Â I 
>used 14 landmarks on 381 CCT, 182 SH, and 15 HY 
>(these are putative species IDs recorded in 
>field until genetics are determined). Â I am 
>trying to determine if HY are morphologically 
>different than CCT and/or SH and if so, how? Â I 
>understand this may be hard with such a small HY sample size. Â
>
>1. Does the difference in sample sizes of CCT, 
>SH, and HY alter the consensus shape effecting 
>my results when comparing group differences in PCA and CVA?

a) N will affect accuracy of all parameter 
estimates: group means, variances etc. (e.g., 
Cardini & Elton, 2007, Zoomorphol. - in my webpage). 
b) Strong N heterogeneity likely will make all 
potential issues in a DA/CVA worse (and its 
assumptions hard to test). I fully agree that 
testing the sensitivity of results when you have 
a perfectly balanced design is a good idea. 
However, then you'll have N=15 within each group 
and 24 variables: overfitting is most likely. 
Probably you'll have to consider some 
dimensionality reduction and check how that too 
might affect your results (e.g., Evin et al., 
2013 - my webpage - and refs therein for other 
papers on DAs, its issues etc. including the 
important ones I've mentioned in a previous 
message - Mitteroecker and Bookstein, Klingenberg & Monteiro etc.). 

Several years ago there was a PhD student doing 
something similar on trouts in Italy. Her dataset 
was also heterogeneous for N but her N was big (a 
few thousands specimens, I think, although many less in the hybrid group). 
I fear that the study has never been published 
but Klingenberg gave her many good suggestions 
she might be happy to share (she's in bcc, if her 
email address is still the right one!). 

Good luck

Andrea

>If so,Â
>2. Is R the best program to use to randomly 
>sample an equal number of CCT from a TPS file?
>
>Thanks for all the posts, love the forum. Â Feel 
>free to contact me directly with any papers or 
>suggestions. Just getting into the field of 
>morphometrics and enjoying its capabilities. 
>
>Thanks,
>Sam Rizza
>Fisheries Graduate Student
>Humboldt State University, CA
><mailto:sf...@humboldt.edu>sf...@humboldt.edu
>Â
>
>
>
>----- End forwarded message -----
>
>

Dr. Andrea Cardini
Researcher in Animal Biology, Dipartimento di 
Scienze Chimiche e Geologiche, Università di 
Modena e Reggio Emilia, l.go S. Eufemia 19, 41121 Modena, Italy
Honorary Fellow, Centre for Anatomical and Human 
Sciences, University of Hull, Cottingham Road, 
Hull, HU6 7RX, UK & University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK
Adjunct Associate Professor, Centre for Forensic 
Science , The University of Western Australia, 35 
Stirling Highway, Crawley WA 6009, Australia

E-mail address: alcard...@gmail.com, andrea.card...@unimore.it
WEBPAGE: http://sites.google.com/site/hymsfme/drandreacardini
Summary of research interests at: 
http://www.dscg.unimore.it/site/home/ricerca/aree-di-ricerca/evolution-taxonomy-and-forensics.html

FREE Yellow BOOK on Geometric Morphometrics: 
http://www.italian-journal-of-mammalogy.it/issue/view/405
or full volume at: 
http://www.italian-journal-of-mammalogy.it/public/journals/3/issue_241_complete_100.pdf

Editorial board for:
Zoomorphology: 
http://www.springer.com/life+sciences/animal+sciences/journal/435
Journal of Zoological Systematics and 
Evolutionary Research: http://www.wiley.com/bw/journal.asp?ref=0947-5745&site=1
Hystrix, the Italian Journal of 
Mammalogy: http://www.italian-journal-of-mammalogy.it/ 

----- End forwarded message -----


Reply via email to