Dear All,
        Greetings! I am going to start a project which deals with studying 
morphological variability between bivalves belonging to Donacidae and 
Mactridae. The morphological variability would mainly focus on shell shape, 
internal structures, palial sinus, etc. I already have shortlisted the 
species I am going to use, but I am confused as to which is a better method 
for studying the variability- using photographs or scans of the specimens. 
The approach would be quite traditional- assigning landmark points, and 
further analysis, etc. All kinds of suggestions are welcome. Thanks!

MORPHMET may be accessed via its webpage at
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MORPHMET" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 

Reply via email to