I stepped out of the classroom to  coach this year, but when I reflect on this, 
this issue of passion, I find myself a victim of 
passionless living as well.  I have worked with an at-risk population for the 
last twelve years and have always been very 
successful bringing children to literacy through their passions.  I struggled 
these last few years with a few students, boys in 
particular, that were extremely hard to reach.  I would say that I failed to 
reach more than a couple because I could not find 
that way into their lives that would engage them with literacy.  I taught in a 
multi-age configuration for nearly all of the 
years that I taught, and in two years I could nearly alwyas find that passion 
at teach through it.  When you combine the 
complications of literacy learning in a greater community which is not a 
strong, literate community with a lack of passion, it 
makes it very hard to reach these children, to bring them into the literacy 
club.  I do not need to work hard to imagine how 
their struggles will snowball as they progress through the educational system.

Lori

On Sun, 24 Dec 2006 09:55 , William Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent:

>Chris wrote
>> Do you think that they have already buried that wonder of childhood deep
>> down inside of them, thinking maybe that it is not cool?
>>
>I don't know.  In previous years, I had students who were passionate about
>their interests, but this group isn't passionate about anything.  They might
>say they love soccer, but they show no interest when I present a soccer
>related book or magazine.
>
>I don't think it's a question of being "cool" even.  I've had students who
>were "cool" but they still secretly had a passion for something.  I truly
>believe that state testing has killed the spark of curiousity and wonder
>that kids usually have at this age....or at any age.  I think having 2000 TV
>channels has created an opposite effect of not offering a smorgasboard of
>ideas and interests, but allowing kids to limit themselves to one or two
>channels with limited ideas and range of thought.  I also think we have a
>nation of kids....Not the ones younger than 18 or 21, but the ones in their
>30's and 40's who are still in the self-centered stages of childhood who
>haven't grown up and would rather be their kids' best buds than to actually
>show some responsiblity to raise them OR WORSE they are too busy doing their
>own things to actually give a hoot about their kids.
>
>I have no problem teaching visual literacy.  I think teaching "reading"
>strategies does them a disservice because all the strategies can be used in
>any activity...they are merely THINKING activities (You get a splinter in
>your hand.  You ask questions, "how did that get there?"  "how am I gonna
>get it out?"  You make connections, "it reminds me of the time I got that
>splinter in my butt..."  You make predictions, "I wonder what will happen if
>I leave it alone?"  "Will it hurt?"  "What if it gets infected?"  You
>visualize, "If it gets infected, it's going to swell up like a balloon and
>fill with pus and throb..." )  So I have no problem with teaching reading
>for TV shows, movies, pop culture, comic books, songs, etc. but you have to
>have students who can do basic thinking...
>
>Bill
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Mosaic mailing list
>[email protected]
>To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to 
>http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/
mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.
>
>Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive. 
>




_______________________________________________
Mosaic mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to 
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.

Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive. 

Reply via email to