OK. That makes sense. I just borrowed The Daily Five from my school board's Professional Learning Centre to read over the summer. It has been highly recommended here plus I subscribe to a web site where they are two of several prominent consultants in education. Elisa Waingort Calgary, Canada In my confusion, I miss interpreted the title to be related to the five pillars of reading, which have been addressed by Allington.
Lori On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 23:24 , Waingort Jimenez, Elisa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent: >Hi Lori, > >I'm not sure I understand your post below. Could you elaborate on the >comment: "this is not an argument against the daily 5...?" Sorry if this has already been asked and responded to. > >Thanks, > >Elisa Waingort > >Calgary, Canada > > > >Google Richard Allington and The Daily 5. He has a lot to say about the > >missing pillars that is well worth considering. This is not an argument > >AGAINST the daily 5, but simply a caution that much is missing. > > > >Lori > > > > > _______________________________________________ Mosaic mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org. Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive.
_______________________________________________ Mosaic mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org. Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive.
