I've had a few off-line replies -- very nice, thankyou -- but this is going 
nowhere on the listserv.  I thought it worth a second try.  Given all the 
conversation recently on points related to this subject, I was surprised 
that there hasn't been a flurry of interest here.  OK.  So it's from the 
Financial Times,  Not an education publication.  All the more reason to 
check it out:  See yourselves from a different angle!  Get some new schema!

There are more connections to education in this article than you can count 
with all your fingers and toes (go ahead and count them).  In this piece, 
you have the business-side validation of what all of you have been saying 
for so long: testing has a role to play, but high stakes testing is simply a 
bad idea; canned programs serve a function, but they are not a path to 
excellence; when you hire professionals, don't hand them scripts.  It's all 
here.  It's brief.  It's eloquent.  It's authoritative.  And it's true.  So 
what more could you want?  Read it.  It will make your day.

Here's the link again: 
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/351ec946-392b-11dc-ab48-0000779fd2ac,Authorised=false.html?_i_location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ft.com%2Fcms%2Fs%2F351ec946-392b-11dc-ab48-0000779fd2ac.html&_i_referer=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ft.com%2Fbusinesslife

Dave Middlebrook
The Textmapping Project
A resource for teachers improving reading comprehension skills instruction.
www.textmapping.org   |   Please share this site with your colleagues!
USA: (609) 771-1781
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 



_______________________________________________
Mosaic mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.

Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive. 

Reply via email to