Hi,

>curriculum specialists demonstrate similar research to demonstrate that the
>*current* approaches to reading instruction are grounded in research showing
>them to be effective.

Keith makes a really good point here. We now know they can't do that (WWC).

I suspect your administrators will still require you to prove it with at least 
some state scores. So, you are welcome to use the data from our school. Our 
school does not have a basal or "core" reading program. We haven't done 
anything very impressive using any of the current buzz words. We don't have any 
"maps" or elaborate "vertical articulattion."  We fight regularly to keep all 
the little assessment pieces outside our doors. All our classrooms use the 
workshop approach for reading. We are Pre-k to grade 8.  In 2006 grades 3-5  
reached a level of proficiency to be labeled a "highly effective" school in the 
state of Illinois. 

So, again, I agree with Keith:
nothing improves
>reading better than:
>1. Reading Good Books
>2. Talking About Good Books

That's what kids do in our workshops.
John
 I guess our 2006 state scores are available on-line through the state 
(Springfield Ball Charter School), or if you think it might help your cause I 
will send you the information.

_______________________________________________________
Sent through e-mol. E-mail, Anywhere, Anytime. http://www.e-mol.com




_______________________________________________
Mosaic mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.

Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive. 

Reply via email to