On some NYS tests, there is an emphasis on editing, but on all tests, part  
of a writing rubric is how students use conventions.  How about sharing  ideas 
on this topic?
Maxine
 
 
In a message dated 6/2/2008 2:54:16 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

I  attended staff development training in  "High Yields Strategies" based  on 
 Classroom Instruction That Works.  The reason that we had the  training is 
because our principals are required to do "Classroom Walkthroughs"  , which are 
on a Blackberry, and they are based on these strategies, with the  strategies 
listed as part of the checklist.  The principal checks off  what he sees in a 
1-2 minute classroom walkthrough.  The principal has to  complete a set 
number every week and then uploads the information; then  someone at central 
office 
receives a report containing the data (in addition  the the principal).  
So, after spending three days in a workshop on  the topic, I can say without 
a doubt that I agree 100% with ellin's remarks on  May 26th.  A lot of the 
strategies are things that have been taught in  the past (i.e., reinforcing 
effort, providing recognition, setting objectives,  cooperative learning) with 
some 
being more skill oriented (note-taking,  graphic organizers).  The main thing 
that we brought back is that a  combination of four or more of these are to 
be included in every lesson and  should be planned ahead of time when you are 
planning your unit.  It also  somewhat reinforces differentiated instruction.  
I did like the part  about homework (we give too much and meaningless).  I 
also agree that a  lot of the strategies are easier implemented in Science, and 
maybe Math and  Social Studies ( Sorry, I forget who mentioned that point).   I 
also  agree with Darcy that attending the workshop didn't change the what, 
when, how  of my teaching.  I already include
most of them where they occur  naturally.    
The NC EOG are not based on this book, but on his  books Dimensions of 
Thinking and Dimensions of Learning.  Dimensions of  Thinking is the earlier 
book 
and both are published through ASCD.  I  heard that our goal summary reports 
(for non NC teachers, this is a report  that breaks the EOG Reading Test into 
Categories which are based on Dimensions  of Learning with how the class scored 
as a whole and then the grade level as a  whole) are not going to include 
Marzano's  categories but the questions  are still based on them.  They are 
going 
to be reported by the  goals.  The EOG's have never been based on Mosaic of 
Thought (if that is  what you mean by MOT).
Sorry for rambling on and on.  I would have  much rather been in a workshop 
on MOT or To Understand.  To be honest,  this is not a book that I would have 
chosen to read or learn in more detail in  a workshop.

Parker - I love the way you put it !!!!!

Kate  




_______________________________________________
Mosaic mailing  list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe or modify your  membership please go  to
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.

Search  the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive.  






**************Get trade secrets for amazing burgers. Watch "Cooking with 
Tyler Florence" on AOL Food.      
(http://food.aol.com/tyler-florence?video=4?&NCID=aolfod00030000000002)
_______________________________________________
Mosaic mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.

Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive. 

Reply via email to