And...not just critized, but several states were denied federal money if it were used for Reading Recovery training, materials, or instruction.
On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 10:45 AM, Renee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > One of the effective programs cited by What Works Clearinghouse is > Reading Recovery, which was one of the programs criticized by the > Reading First people. heh. > > Renee > > On Sep 20, 2008, at 9:25 AM, jan sanders wrote: > > > "Houghton Mifflin Reading," was denied a What Works Clearinghouse > > effectiveness rating due to insufficient evidence of its effect on > > children's learning, per a report recently released by the U.S. > > Department of Education's Institute of Education Sciences... > > > > It seems the Clearinghouse had trouble giving an effective rating to > > what is currently available.... > > > "Sometimes it's a little better to travel than to arrive." > ~ Robert Pirsig > > > > _______________________________________________ > Mosaic mailing list > [email protected] > To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to > http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org. > > Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive. > > _______________________________________________ Mosaic mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org. Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive.
