I just came away from Frank Serafini's workshop today and realized how  
closely aligned his thoughts were to the posts on the listserv as of late.... 
he  
is a very funny man who makes you think about why you do what you do in your  
practice..... his big talk today was about comprehension strategies and his  
feelings that perhaps we are taking the strategy instruction a bit too far and  
teaching as if they are the big units in a reading workshop. ...rather than a  
way to access those big units of study. He did a marvelous job of showing how 
 graphic organizers and reader responses should be used as discussion 
starters  rather than an end "product" which teachers  tend to use as  
assessment. He 
asked us to consider a graphic organizer like a t-chart in which  the child 
or a group of children determine the parameters. He said if teachers  are 
filling in the top of the t-chart and kids are responding to our descriptors  
then 
we've reduced their thinking and asked them to align their thoughts to  ours. 
I am sure I am not saying it well.... but it drove so many points  home that I 
must say I am guilty of..... 
 
He told a funny story of how a teacher was trying to compliment him on his  
new non-fiction series he has written for primary kids... how she uses them to  
teach inferences... boy did he go off on it... humorously... making the point 
 that the books are about nature and his purpose was never to write books to 
go  with a unit on inferencing.... he kept showing how inferencing happens...  
that it is determined by the genre of the text: where it happens, when it  
happens, why it happens, and with what other strategies kids use while they are 
 
inferencing are all text bound... not a study in and of itself... that it 
will  take various shapes... or forms... if I had to give a "visualization" for 
 
it.
 
He also gave many ideas of how inferencing works( and I use that example  
because the last few posts were about inferencing) outside the book (where he  
says all inferences happen) but yet, still bound by what you have learned in 
the 
 text. To drive that point home he did an activity with us in which he read  
excerpts from the book and then asked volunteers to become the book character. 
 The audience could ask any question they wanted of the characters (not  
necessarily related to the plot) ... but the volunteers had to answer the  
questions by inferencing what they thought the character would say about a  
particular question.... think dinner party talk! Then use the responses to  
determine 
if they were logical and in line with what you thought about the  character.... 
and it is the later part... the discussion.... that is most  important not 
the response of the volunteer....
 
His focus was geared for third grade and up but it really was a "mindset"  he 
was talking about... He showed how in primary we tell the kids to use  
illustrations to support text... but he pulled plenty of picture books out  
that  
not only showed symmetrical support (images parallel the the  information) but 
"enhancement" interplay where illustrations enhance the text  (think The Boy 
Who Looked like Lincoln) where the ah ha is in the picture and  adds so much 
more to the text then the words can say... and then counterpoint  interplay 
where 
the image provides information that is contradicted by the text  (think The 
Sweetest Fig)  Anyway...  this might be old hat for some  but it blew away some 
of cornerstones of pedagogy and forced me to rethink ....  and maybe looking  
out from a  lens is as productive or perhaps more  productive than focusing 
on the stuff under the lens. 
Pam
In a message dated 12/11/2008 5:44:22 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
[email protected] writes:
 
I like  Bev's idea of Comprehension Connections 
(mcGregor). It is easy to  implement right away.  I also think that Daily 
Five would be a good  start.  You mentioned class size and it combines 
management 
and reading.  It sounds like your teacher's have a lot to handle, and 
Comprehension  Connections and the Daily Five use activities to get going right 
 away.

Once the group is established, MOT would be great to  study.

Linda

_______________________________________________
Mosaic  mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe or modify your  membership please go  to
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.

Search  the MOSAIC archives at  http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive.



**************Make your life easier with all your friends, email, and 
favorite sites in one place.  Try it now. 
(http://www.aol.com/?optin=new-dp&icid=aolcom40vanity&ncid=emlcntaolcom00000010)
_______________________________________________
Mosaic mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.

Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive.

Reply via email to