Rosie, you can use the HM selections, just switch up the comprehension 
strategies so that they make sense. I hate the way HM tries to make you cover 2 
strategies or 1 skill and 1 strategy for every selection. Narrow it down to 1 
immediately--just choose the one you think is most important for real readers. 
I am not super familiar with the 5th grade text and don't have it here, but 
I'll make some educated guesses. One example: I think the first theme has to do 
with weather--you could concentrate on determining importance for these 
selections. This would be the comprehension strand of your mandated teaching. 
But instead of the ridiculous HM busywork, get them to really think about one 
thing for an extended period of time. Read aloud to them (consider some of the 
picture books by Seymour Simon) and show them how to determine importance. What 
your program is sorely missing, IMO, is an independent reading piece. Instead 
of centers/busywork, kids should be reading. If they were reading, you could 
tell them to follow-up on the lesson during their independent reading. Another 
example: we are going to pass out the HM texts in a couple of weeks so that we 
can read from Theme 2, the Focus on Poetry. There are excellent poems for our 
analysis. This will follow on the heels of our study of evoking images and 
coincide with our writer's workshop study of poetry. I'm proud of myself that 
we'll finally crack open HM. Yet another example: I'm pretty sure Katie's Trunk 
is one of the later HM selections. This is an outstanding story by Turner, 
really outstanding, and would be excellent for teaching inference. But don't 
settle for just one selection. I just can't remember the others. Find 3 
selections that would "go with" a strategy and teach it for 3 weeks. I hate 
HM's mile wide-inch deep approach. Dig in! Your students will love it and so 
will you. 

Okay, deep breath, here's how I teach comprehension strategies (in addition to 
my earlier post about lessons). I read the chapter in MOT (sometimes for the 
103rd time) and then I make sentence strips for anything in the chapter and the 
bullets at the end of the chapter that I want to teach. Each sentence strip 
gets "matched" to a picture book (or more than one if I think it needs more 
than one lesson) and becomes a lesson. I have come to this method over lots of 
trial and error and I swear by it. It's all about reading. I read aloud, model 
using the strategy, and we work the strategy together. Then the kids try it on 
in their own reading. I am the #1 fan of gradual release of responsibility. 
Remember, it's all about authenticity. Centers are not authentic. Reading is a 
life skill and a life joy. 

Judy 




----- Original Message ----- 
From: [email protected] 
To: [email protected] 
Sent: Sunday, January 31, 2010 12:38:16 PM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific 
Subject: Re: [MOSAIC] comprehension strategies in my school 

Judy, 

Thank you so much for your responses. I wish that we had similar 
minded people in our district, but we don't. Although our current 
Executive Director is leaving and will be replaced with a former 
principal from our district, I really don't see the philosophy changing 
much. I am not allowed to stray from the HM text, and our literacy 
coach is seen by many as a lesson plan police. She comes and checks 
that you have your objectives written, and will do a demonstration 
lesson if you ask. She is currently pushing Thinking Maps, which I 
have begun to use. But overuse of anything, can't really be good, can 
it? 

I guess what I am looking for is some way to incorporate the strategies 
into the HM text. That being said, I don't have a strong understanding 
of the strategies or how to teach them. I did read MOT many years ago, 
but can't find my copy now. 

Our current literacy block is mandated as follows: 30-40 of whole 
group instruction, where I am teach the 4 domains of reading required 
of the upper grades-phonics, fluency, comprehension and vocabulary. 
Additionally, we must spend 60 minutes with small groups, while the 
other students do stations. Stations are supposed to have a "product" 
so that we are holding the kids accountable. Workbook pages are not 
allowed. Technically the kids are supposed to do a different station 
each day related to the domains, very time consuming and seems like 
busy work to me. Small groups meet based on their reading level and we 
use the leveled reader that comes with the series. 

I just don't know how this is effective. I have four small groups, and 
can meet with them for only 15 mins. Although the literacy coach does 
tell us that we don't have to meet with the highest kids each day. 

Any additional help would be greatly appreciated! 

Rosie 


-----Original Message----- 
From: [email protected] 
To: Mosaic: A Reading Comprehension Strategies Email Group 
<[email protected]> 
Sent: Sun, Jan 31, 2010 11:48 am 
Subject: [MOSAIC] comprehension strategies in my school 


Comprehension strategies: what is the state of comprehension 
instruction in your 
school? How well is comprehension being taught? What can teacher 
leaders do to 
help improve practices? 

I am thrilled to reply to this question. My small district in Northern 
California was an early comprehension strategy follower--they even paid 
for 
Ellin Keene to spend a day speaking to us and sent many teachers (not 
me, I was 
new to the district then) to Colorado for training. Alas, California 
went the 
way of the politicians and we were given a choice of using Houghton 
Mifflin or 
Open Court. Our district chose HM and we were expected to teach it 
"with 
fidelity." I did so for one year and then I returned to comprehension 
strategies 
(occasionally using the text from HM for shared reading). THE GOOD NEWS 
is that 
finally, this year, our principal has sanctioned a return to 
comprehension 
strategies (hmmm, seems those basals weren't the answer to test 
scores). Of 
course, I never gave them up, but it's nice to be working in the open 
again. So 
now we have a lot of training and retraining to do. It's hard to 
believe, 
because my district (and boy, was I proud of it) was once so entren 
ched in MOT, we have teachers who have never even read Mosaic. We do 
have a 
coach and a MOT committee and we've been given 3 Learning Communities 
for 
teaching comprehension strategies. At the first one, I brought in 
students and 
modeled a think aloud (I want to grow up to be Ellin Keene) and we 
discussed a 
piece of literature thinking about how adults use comprehension 
strategies. At 
the second we again discussed literature and shared how our work is 
going. The 
third (a whole afternoon on a staff development day) is yet to be 
determined. I 
am thrilled to be an official comprehension strategy teacher again. 

Judy 

P.S. All your questions are excellent. May I reply to more than one? 
_______________________________________________ 
Mosaic mailing list 
[email protected] 
To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to 
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org. 

Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive. 




_______________________________________________ 
Mosaic mailing list 
[email protected] 
To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to 
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org. 

Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive. 

_______________________________________________
Mosaic mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.

Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive.

Reply via email to