You are fortunate that you had administrators that were willing to allow you to 
do this. I was forced out of my la content specialist position because the new 
superintendent brought in a curriculum coordinator. He claimed she knew a lot 
about literacy. (I was given the choice of teaching 6th grade or retiring. 
Since this would have been my last year, I retired.) 
I now learn that teachers are being forced to use the basal with fidelity. They 
are not allowed to use any of the lessons from the comprehension toolkit, no 
writing lessons outside of the very poor basal instruction. They have no time 
for reading workshop, literature circles or writing workshop! All practices 
that were embraced by most teachers. Understandably, the teachers are upset. I 
don't know how many are closing their doors and doing what they know best, 
either. 
I'd like to think that the assessments will prove how wrong this instruction 
is, but in 2 of the 4 schools, the students come to school with such great 
backgrounds that they will probably progress. Unfortunately, the better 
teachers know that those children would have done better with a combination of 
basal instruction and reading workshop. 
How sad! 
Carol 
----- Original Message ----- 
From: [email protected] 
To: [email protected] 
Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2010 7:20:49 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central 
Subject: Re: [MOSAIC] RTI - Any info on AIMS Web? 

I love reading this discussion of Aimsweb! I was so frustrated when 
our district used this program last year. It goes against EVERY single 
thing I know about reading instruction and reading assessment. 
Remember: "What gets measured, gets done!" I knew I did not want 
teaching for fast reading to get "done" in our district. I even 
emailed Tim Rasinski last year and got a great response about how he 
felt these 1 minute assessments were a travesty! 

We (reading specialists) decided to write our own progress monitoring 
assessments that actually assess real reading: ALL aspects of fluency, 
accuraccy, comprehension (literal and inferential). We bought rigby 
texts and have created over 150 tests from levels 3-34. I don't think 
we knew what we were getting ourselves into when we started (over 800 
pages of assessments!), and I'm not sure we would do it again. Now 
that it is done though, we are happy we did! We feel we actually get 
useful information this year. Yes, it does take longer to administer 
(although we don't do them every week), but as the IRA says, we 
shouldn't sacrifice quality for efficiency. 

I say that anyone who is really unhappy with what they are using should 
keep speaking up and searching for something that makes sense! 

Tricia Burke 
Reading Specialist 


_______________________________________________ 
Mosaic mailing list 
[email protected] 
To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to 
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org. 

Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive. 

_______________________________________________
Mosaic mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.

Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive.

Reply via email to