I 100% agree with ALL students having equal access to ALL of the  
curriculum.  I have been very privileged to work with students that do not  
perform 
well on standardized tests and for years had been "pulled out" of the  
classroom for "remedial" instruction.  I fought hard for a push in model  and 
it 
works really well. I am completely dumbfounded by "theories" that state  the 
students which need the most STABILITY in their daily routines are the ones  
continually disrupted!  
I am also a HUGE supporter of the arts in every sense of the word!  I  have 
brilliant artists in my classroom yearly. I see the depth of knowledge  and 
confidence my students feel when they are in art , music, or  PE!  
Knowledge is not confined to a "text" book.  There is so much  evidence now 
that 
supports background knowledge as the number one  component of good reading 
comprehension.  Doesn't that mean we need to  EXPAND the students curriculum as 
oppose to narrow it?
Just my thoughts....
 
Ali/4th grade/FL
 
 
 In a message dated 7/17/2011 2:59:13 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
[email protected] writes:
 
Sally,

When I was teaching art, students came to me for one  hour  
approximately once every three weeks or so. I wish, wish, wish  I  
could have had them more often. With a few exceptions, most  teachers  
just brought the students to me, dropped them off, and  returned in an  
hour to pick them up. For the most part this worked  fine for me  
because *some* of the teachers who stayed would  sometimes interject  
their own strategies and thoughts and opinions  and directions into my  
lesson, which drove me nuts. But overall, I  really wish that the  
teachers had stayed to listen to the  introductions, participate in  
the activities themselves, listened  more closely to the questions I  
asked during discussions, and gave  more thought to what was actually  
happening in my classroom, because  there was tons of problem-solving,  
small motor development, eye-hand  coordination, development of  
observation skills, juxtapositioning of  overall composition and  
internal details, talking about great art  works (you'd be surprised  
what a 1st grader can find in and  extrapolate from closely observing  
the Mona Lisa!), writing about  their art work, critiquing other's art  
work, comparing student  works, etc etc etc. There is a ton of  
language arts and math work in  there. Tons.

Off my soapbox now....
Renee


On Jul 17,  2011, at 9:57 AM, Sally Thomas wrote:

> You have me thinking as I am  going to bring the two emails to my  
> class on
> Thursday  for discussion.
>
> Maybe there should be a "push in" with  knowledgeable support teachers
> co-planning with the regular teacher to  help create better reading  
> workshop
> type  classrooms.  And two informed teachers have to be better than   
> one in
> terms of giving differentiated support to  children????
>
> Sally
>
>
> On 7/17/11 7:54 AM,  "Renee" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Oh my.....  I SOOOOO disagree with this!  No child should be excluded
>>  from equal access to the curriculum, and that includes Art, Music,
>>  P.E., or whatever else, no matter where they are performing. In   
>> fact, I
>> would say that low-performing children might  need these parts of
>> curriculum most of all.... to help them see  and experience the grand
>> intertwining of all parts of learning.  Children who are
>> "underperforming" according to some standardized  assessment shouldn't
>> be punished and have their curriculum  narrowed down. Children don't
>> need *more* reading instruction,  they need *better* reading  
>> instruction
>> (and in  my opinion, that means more actual reading and less actual
>>  drilling).
>>
>> I understand too well the frustration of  having students pulled  
>> out of
>> class for small  group instruction and in fact I am not particularly
>> supportive of  trading students around among teachers that people  
>> do  so
>> much of these days. But narrow the curriculum because a child  is
>> reading below grade level? Sorry..... can't support that  one.
>>
>> Some food for thought:
>>
>> 10  Lessons the Arts Teach
>>
>> 1. The arts teach children to  make good judgments about qualitative
>> relationships.
>>  Unlike much of the curriculum in which correct answers and rules
>>  prevail, in the arts, it
>> is judgment rather than rules that  prevail.
>> 2. The arts teach children that problems can have more  than one  
>> solution
>> and that questions can have  more than one answer.
>> 3. The arts celebrate multiple  perspectives.
>> One of their large lessons is that there are many  ways to see and
>> interpret the world.
>> 4. The arts teach  children that in complex forms of problem solving
>> purposes are  seldom fixed, but change with circumstance and
>> opportunity.  Learning in the arts requires the ability and a
>> willingness to  surrender to the unanticipated possibilities of the  
>>  work
>> as it unfolds.
>> 5. The arts make vivid the fact  that neither words in their literal
>> form nor numbers exhaust what  we can know. The limits of our language
>> do not define the limits  of our cognition.
>> 6. The arts teach students that small  differences can have large
>> effects.
>> The arts traffic  in subtleties.
>> 7. The arts teach students to think through and  within a material.
>> All art forms employ some means through which  images become real.
>> 8. The arts help children learn to say what  cannot be said.
>> When children are invited to disclose what a work  of art helps them
>> feel, they must reach into their poetic  capacities to find the words
>> that will do the job.
>> 9.  The arts enable us to have experience we can have from no other
>>  source
>> and through such experience to discover the range and  variety of what
>> we are capable of feeling.
>> 10. The  arts' position in the school curriculum symbolizes to the  
>>  young
>> what adults believe is important.
>>
>>  SOURCE: Eisner, E. (2002). The Arts and the Creation of Mind, In
>>  Chapter 4, What the Arts Teach and How It Shows. (pp. 70-92). Yale
>>  University Press. Available from NAEA Publications. NAEA grants   
>> reprint
>> permission for this excerpt from Ten Lessons  with proper  
>> acknowledgment
>> of its source and  NAEA.
>>
>>
>>  Renee
>>
>>
>> On Jul 16, 2011, at 3:13 PM, Amy  Lesemann wrote:
>>
>>> We had arguments about this, and I  lost until a new teacher came  
>>> in and
>>>  supported me. Frankly, if a student is 2 or more years- even  less,
>>> frankly -
>>> then they really do need to  sacrifice music, or art, or another
>>> special  for
>>> extra reading instruction, and stay in the regular class  for regular
>>> reading
>>> instruction. Before I got  that extra vote in the faculty  
>>> meetings,  the
>>> remedial kids were getting pulled out of their regular  classes to  
>>> meet
>>> with
>>>  me...so they were getting exactly the same amount of instruction  as
>>> everyone
>>> else. That's not the idea. They  should be participating in  
>>> reading and
>>>  writing workshop, and then going to the specialist to target   
>>> their weak
>>> areas - in phonics, using context  clues, and so on.
>>>
>>> Good  luck!
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Amy Lesemann,  Reading Specialist and Director, Independent Learning
>>>  Center
>>> St. Thomas the Apostle Elementary  School
>>
>>
>> " What was once educationally  significant, but difficult to measure,
>> has been replaced by what  is insignificant and easy to measure. So  
>> now
>> we  test how well we have taught what we do not value."
>> — Art Costa,  emeritus professor, California State  University
>>
>>
>>
>>  _______________________________________________
>> Mosaic mailing  list
>> [email protected]
>> To unsubscribe or  modify your membership please go to
>>  http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/ 
>>  mosaic_literacyworkshop.org
>>
>> Search the MOSAIC archives  at  http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive
>>
>
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
> Mosaic mailing  list
> [email protected]
> To unsubscribe or modify your  membership please go to
> http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/  
> mosaic_literacyworkshop.org
>
> Search the MOSAIC  archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive
>

"The conductor of  an orchestra doesn't make a sound... He depends for  
his power on his  ability to make other people powerful."
~ Benjamin  Zander


_______________________________________________
Mosaic  mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe or modify your  membership please go  to
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org

Search  the MOSAIC archives at  http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive
_______________________________________________
Mosaic mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org

Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive

Reply via email to