Thanks everyone for your responses. Thank you for the clarification Jennifer. I 
love this group!

Evelia 

Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 18, 2013, at 6:35 AM, "Palmer, Jennifer" <jennifer.pal...@hcps.org> 
wrote:

> This is another case of needing to clarify terminology. 
> Reliable- a test given that's likely to get the same score each time it's 
> given.
> Validity- the test measures what it's supposed to measure in this case 
> reading ability. 
> I don't want to oversimplify this, but rather clarify my earlier point.
> 
> It's a case of what are you using the testing for? Are you needing a lexile 
> to match kids to books? If so, find a lexile by informally trying books of 
> different lexiles and seeing what the child comprehends. It's valid because 
> it more closely matches a real reading task required in a classroom. It's not 
> as reliable because of the informal nature of it--- you and I might get 
> different results with the same child and the same book.
> 
> In a situation where I need to measure student growth over time-- I'd want to 
> use the SRI, or Fountas and Pinnell benchmark assessments-- something likely 
> to be reliable. To inform my day to day instruction, my assessment method can 
> be a bit less reliable, but I want it to have as high a validity as possible.
> 
> Nothing wrong with data crunching ... There is an audience that needs the 
> data from standardized tests--and as a teacher i can gain info from that type 
> of test too--but everyone needs to understand the benefits and limitations of 
> that kind of data.(and that has led to deep misuses of standardized tests.)  
> And when the data crunch includes teacher observation data... The level of 
> validity is likely to be higher and the data much more useful to inform day 
> to day instruction . 
> 
> How does one check comprehension informally? Ask a child what the passage or 
> book is about. They should be giving you much more than is on the fly leaf. 
> If they can tell you characters setting problem and solution there's a good 
> beginning understanding. If they can infer theme, or critique authors craft, 
> there's likely a more solid understanding .
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On Jul 17, 2013, at 9:58 AM, "Renee G" <share2lear...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Actually, I would say that Jennifer's option of having kids read passages 
>> from the actual books is MORE reliable, since it is more real and authentic. 
>> Unless you are hung up on data crunching, of course.
>> 
>> But whenever possible I am for putting the "data gathering" back into the 
>> hands and minds of teachers.
>> 
>> Renee
>> 
>> On Jul 17, 2013, at 5:01 AM, Palmer, Jennifer wrote:
>> 
>>> The SRI costs money--but is the most reliable way to get a lexile.The 
>>> cheapest thing to do is to test books you know the lexile of on children. 
>>> Ask them to read a passage from several books of differing lexiles... Do an 
>>> informal comprehension check and you are good to go. Less reliable but 
>>> likely more valid to inform classroom instruction...
>>> 
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>> 
>>> On Jul 16, 2013, at 11:17 PM, "evelia cadet" <cadeteve...@hotmail.com> 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Are there any free assessments out there that I could use to determine the 
>>>> Lexile reading level of my students? Thank you.
>>>> 
>>>> Evelia\
>> 
>> 
>> Deep down we must have real affection for each other, a clear realization or 
>> recognition of our shared human status.  At the same time, we must openly 
>> accept all ideologies and systems as a means of solving humanity's problems. 
>>  One country, one nation, one ideology, one system is not sufficient.
>> ~ The Dalai Lama
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mosaic mailing list
>> Mosaic@literacyworkshop.org
>> To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
>> http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org
>> 
>> Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Mosaic mailing list
> Mosaic@literacyworkshop.org
> To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
> http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org
> 
> Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive
> 

_______________________________________________
Mosaic mailing list
Mosaic@literacyworkshop.org
To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org

Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive

Reply via email to