Hi, the performance in terms of quality is the same for both (be careful to train language models with the "-unk" switch, though), irstlm loads much faster due to its binary format and also has a smaller memory footprint. It is slightly slower to use.
-phi On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 1:45 PM, kate mins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > I would like to know what are the differences between the Srilm to Irstlm > toolkit? > another thing - from your experiences with the Moses system/training > process, which toolkit is recommended or better(srilm/Irstlm)? (speed of the > process, files size,quality ...etc..) > thanks > Kate Mins > > _______________________________________________ > Moses-support mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support > > _______________________________________________ Moses-support mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support
