On Monday 23 Nov 2009 11:56:57 Hieu Hoang wrote: > personally, I would link it with the static library, rather than the > dynamic lib so you don't have to change your PATH lib. > > to do that, move your dynamic libraries out of sight of the compiler > when compiling. >
Good suggestion - I've resorted to this before. Ideally I'd get automake to link boost statically, but I haven't figured out how to do this without it trying to link everything (libc etc) statically - which doesn't work very well, regards Barry _______________________________________________ Moses-support mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support
