Giza++ and MERT both can produce different results, even when using the same code, corpora etc. This is because multiple solutions exist and each time you run Moses, you find one of these (different) optima.
Miles 2010/1/11 李贤华 <[email protected]>: > Hi all, > > I ran some experiments with moses like, half a year ago. > And recently I ran them for a second time. > The time I got the reuslts, I got confused. > Beacause they're so different from those I got previously. > > The softwares I used was not changed, the same version. > The corpus is of course the same. I just copied them. > And I used the same script the run the experiments, just changed some > directory. > It seems I ran the same experiments on two different servers at different > time, and got different results. > > I checked alignment results, aligned.grow-diag-and-final, > and there're a lot of differences. > I also checked moses.ini, and the parameters are greatly different. > > So, has anybody ever come into this situation? I'm really confused... > > > > Regards, > > Lee Xianhua > > ________________________________ > 2010-01-11 > _______________________________________________ > Moses-support mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support > > -- The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
_______________________________________________ Moses-support mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support
