hey thanks for your answers.. let's see if i got this right.. I trained with -monotonicity-bidirectional-fe, the training went fine (the problem is translating, as I mentioned before) and here is some extracts of the generated files:
reordering-table: " ( from ||| " ( del ||| 0.6 0.4 0.6 0.4 " ( generative components ) , ||| " ( componentes de generación ) , ||| 0.6 0.4 0.6 0.4 " ( generative components ) ||| " ( componentes de generación ) ||| 0.6 0.4 0.6 0.4 extract.o a ||| una ||| mono other a production plant for ||| una planta de producción ||| mono other a production plant for ||| una planta de producción de ||| mono other moses.ini # distortion (reordering) files [distortion-file] 0-0 monotonicity-bidirectional-fe 2 /home/puchi/redsea/work_mono-bi-fe/work/model/reordering-table.gz # distortion (reordering) weight [weight-d] 0.3 0.3 0.3 now that's what the training generated, i didnt change anything. So what ur saying is that the 2 in the moses.ini should be a 4? because there are 4 weights in the reordering table?.. Then why does it generate the wrong numbers if it worked fine for de msd model? thanks! 2010/3/20 Sara Stymne <[email protected]> > Hi Maria! > > The model msd-bidirectional-e will not work, since you can only > condition lexical reordering models on either the foreign phrase (f) or > both the foreign and the target (fe). Only on the target (e) is not > supported. > > There is actually an error on the Moses webpage > (http://www.statmt.org/moses/?n=FactoredTraining.BuildReorderingModel), > where it says that this e-model is acceptable. > > If you want to train unidirectional models, you should not use > -unidirectional in your command for the training script, it is chosen by > default. So change your second model to: msd-fe, at training time. > > At decoding time: if you're using a monotonicity model, make sure that > the number of weights specified in the moses.ini file, actually are the > same as in the reordering table. > > /Sara > > > 2010-03-18 21:57, maria sol ferrer skrev: > > Hey, thanks for your help. > > > > Does anyone else know what might be wrong with changing the reordering > > model? has anyone done it successfully? I really cant get it working and > > there's no help on the web. > > > > Thanks a lot. > > > > 2010/3/19 Hieu Hoang <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > > > > i can't see any obvious problems. > > > > i don't know much about the lexicalized reordering. It seems like > > the number of scores is not what is expected by the decoder for the > > particular setting specified in the ini file. I think in training, > > you have to specify what type of reordering model you want, and > > specify the SAME type when decoding. > > > > sorry i can't be of more help > > > > > > On 17 March 2010 21:35, maria sol ferrer <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > Hey, thanks for your answer, here is the ini file and the output > > from when i try to translate... > > > > 2010/3/18 Hieu Hoang <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> > > > > can you send me the ini file, i'll try & see if there's > > anything obviously wrong > > > > > > On 17/03/2010 05:09, maria sol ferrer wrote: > >> Hi, I was running some tests on different reordering types > >> and when I tried with > >> > >> msd-bidirectional-e, msd-unidirectional-fe and > >> monotonicity-bidirectional-fe > >> > >> the first 2 gave the error that reordering doesnt exist > >> during training, the third trained fine but when trying to > >> translate, it didnt, the only message there was was: > >> Reordering types NOT individualy weighted! (By the way, > >> the default reordering works fine) > >> > >> I searched the web and all I found was another question on > >> the mailing list like this, about the monotonicity > >> reordering (all of them) not working, but it was never > >> answered. > >> > >> I'm running an english-spanish decoder and the reordering > >> is not so good, it just pretty much translates in the > >> english order, which is not always correct in spanish. > >> > >> I'd apreciate your help, thanks. > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Moses-support mailing list > >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > >> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Moses-support mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support > > _______________________________________________ > Moses-support mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support >
_______________________________________________ Moses-support mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support
