I believe the conclusion of that thread was that using KenLM makes Moses deterministic.
On 10/26/11 11:34, Germán Sanchis Trilles wrote: > Hi Hieu, > > thanks for your answer. I guess that, in case the search is not > completely deterministic, I will be better off by modifying the -osgx > option so that it will output all the info I need. I was trying to > avoid that, but it seems there will be no other option. > > Thanks, > > Germán > > > > On Wed, 26 Oct 2011, Hieu Hoang wrote: > >> hi german >> >> I don't think decoding is guaranteed to give the same results in 2 >> consecutive runs, >> for the same model and input. This email thread was discussing this >> issue >> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.nlp.moses.user/4327/focus=4341 >> However, I'm not sure how much different 2 runs can be. >> >> You might wanna talk to Christian Buck who I think is trying to bash >> the search graph >> output into something more useful >> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.nlp.moses.user/4374/ >> >> On 24/10/2011 23:05, Germán Sanchis Trilles wrote: >> Hello list, >> >> I was trying to output a search graph with both the single >> model scores and >> the transition value. While the single model scores are >> produced by the >> option -osgx, the transition value is only present when using >> the option >> -osgx. Since I am not doing this myself, I thought that the >> best choice >> would be to output both files by rerunning Moses (since they >> seem to be >> exclusive) and then merge both into a single file. However, I >> found a >> problem when doing so, which is that both files do not have the >> same number >> of lines (and hence I assume that the original search-graphs >> did not have >> the same amount of edges. So I would have two questions, I guess: >> >> - Why is there information produced by -osg that is not present >> when >> specifying -osgx? >> - Why are -osg and -osgx exclusive? Is this really the desired >> behaviour? >> - Finally, if the same moses.ini is specified with the same >> models, why are >> the search graphs not identical? Are there random >> initialisations (or >> something similar) that account for this behaviour? >> >> the command lines used when observing these results were pretty >> simple, >> i.e. moses -f <moses.ini> -i <file> [-osg|-osgx] >> >> Thanks in advance for your answer, >> >> best regards, >> >> Germán Sanchis-Trilles >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Moses-support mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support >> >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Moses-support mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support
_______________________________________________ Moses-support mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support
