Hi Barry, Thanks for reply. I have actually read that paper. According to it, if I understood correctly, the string-to-tree rule extraction is based on DeNeefe et al. (2007), which is in turn based on GHKM (Galley et al., 2004). However, for me it's not clear about tree-to-string and tree-to-tree models; whether they are using the same principle or based on other techniques?
Regards, Rasul. Quoting Barry Haddow <[email protected]>: > Hi Rasul > > This paper is probably a good start, and should give you pointers to further > literature. > > http://mastarpj.nict.go.jp/IWSLT2009/proceedings/TP_4_hoang.pdf > > cheers - Barry > > On Friday 30 March 2012 12:13:46 [email protected] wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I was trying to find out what methods (publish work) the different >> syntactic modeling approaches (tree-to-string, string-to-tree and >> tree-to-tree ) in Moses are based on. I was wondering if somebody >> could help me with references of such published work. >> >> Regards, >> Rasul. >> _______________________________________________ >> Moses-support mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support >> > > -- > Barry Haddow > University of Edinburgh > +44 (0) 131 651 3173 > > -- > The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in > Scotland, with registration number SC005336. > > _______________________________________________ Moses-support mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support
