I could imagine if you were translating N languages, all into a common target language, that it might be a memory footprint savings to be able to do this all within a common process. The savings would be from being able to have a single language model instance.
Lane On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 2:00 AM, Philipp Koehn <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > my understanding is that this is not currently possible. > > But why would you want to do this? If you translate with different > systems, why not just run different processes? > > The motivation to do this in the server process is that it avoids > keeping multiple server processes at the same time, which is not > a concern with batch Moses. > > -phi > > On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 12:55 AM, Fong Po Po <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Dear all: >> >> I have read page in >> http://www.statmt.org/moses/?n=Moses.AdvancedFeatures#ntoc22 >> This page say that Moses Server can run in multi translation >> systems. >> Can Traditional Moses (not Moses Server) also run in multi >> translation systems? >> Can you help me? Thanks! >> >> Best Regards, >> Fong Pui Chi >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Moses-support mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Moses-support mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support > > -- When a place gets crowded enough to require ID's, social collapse is not far away. It is time to go elsewhere. The best thing about space travel is that it made it possible to go elsewhere. -- R.A. Heinlein, "Time Enough For Love"
_______________________________________________ Moses-support mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support
