Hi,

the default choice in the example experiment.perl files
is "msd-bidirectional-fe", which is what we commonly
use here in Edinburgh.

-phi

On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Cuong Hoang <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi all,
> I have another question. Sorry for asking too many questions tonight.
>
> I want to use another distortion cost model which has only four features. I
> use MOSES as the decoder for the new model.
> However, I have a problem with configuring moses.ini file. I wonder which
> one of Orientation parameter we should use?
> When I choose msd as the following command:
>
> 0-0 wbe-msd-bidirectional-fe-allff 4 /home/cuongh/MOSES/reordering-table
>
> The decoder reports the error:
>
> Loading lexical distortion models...have 1 models
> Creating lexical reordering...
> weights: 0.300 0.300 0.300 0.300
> ERROR:Lexical reordering model (type wbe-msd-bidirectional-fe-allff):
> expected 0 weights, got 4
>
> Thus, I want to ask two questions:
> 1. How to overcome the above problem?
> 2. If I replace the msd as monotonicity for the Orientation - it is okie.
> But I afraid that when I do that, I don't have a good comparison between the
> new model and the MOSES's distortion cost model.
> This comes from the fact that If I also use monotonicity as the Orientation
> parameter for the MOSES's distortion cost model:
>
> 0-0 wbe-monotonicity-bidirectional-fe-allff 6
> /home/cuongh/MOSES/model/reordering-table
>
> The decoder also shows another error:
>
> Creating lexical reordering...
> weights: 0.300 0.300 0.300 0.300 0.300 0.300
> ERROR:Lexical reordering model (type
> wbe-monotonicity-bidirectional-fe-allff): expected 0 weights, got 6
>
> Thanks
> C. Hoang
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> C. Hoang
>
> {Mimosa, SMT}@Addict
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moses-support mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support
>
_______________________________________________
Moses-support mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support

Reply via email to