Oh, the lucene database stores the aligned corpus, rather than the trained phrase table? Uli knows more about the suffix array. yep, there is no easy way!
On 24 July 2013 14:32, Marcin Junczys-Dowmunt <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks, I am mainly interested in reusing most of the score calculation > methods in BilingualDynSuffixArray.* and was looking for an easy way to do > that. Now that I have inspected the code for a while I see there is no easy > way :) > > W dniu 24.07.2013 15:29, Hieu Hoang pisze: > > yes, copy PhraseDictionaryDynSuffixArray, or indeed, your own > PhraseDictionaryCompact. > > there's some docs on adding feature functions. > http://www.statmt.org/moses/?n=Moses.FeatureFunctions > > it should be easier than a year ago when you added PhraseDictionaryCompact > > On 24 July 2013 13:29, Marcin Junczys-Dowmunt <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi list, >> I am planning to integrate a dynamic phrase table based on a lucene >> index and I am wondering how to approach it. Basically it should have >> the same functionality as the Dynamic Suffix Array already present in >> Moses. Now I am wondering if for a first working version it would be >> enough just to hijack DynSuffixArray.h and implement all the public >> functions with CLucene. Any hidden pitfalls there? The index would be >> indexed by the source sentence and contain alignment data and target >> sentences as fields. >> Best, >> Marcin >> _______________________________________________ >> Moses-support mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support >> > > > > -- > Hieu Hoang > Research Associate > University of Edinburgh > http://www.hoang.co.uk/hieu > > > -- Hieu Hoang Research Associate University of Edinburgh http://www.hoang.co.uk/hieu
_______________________________________________ Moses-support mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support
